Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HIGHLAND HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:06 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HIGHLAND HOSPITAL
CCN 330164 | NY | 261 beds | Current EBITDA $-50.1M → Pro Forma $-26.1M (+$24.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$456.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-50.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$24.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-26.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$17.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$24.0M
Modeled Uplift
$18.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $18.1M (vs $24.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$292K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$24.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.1M$9.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.8M$251K$9.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.4M$4.2M$5.6M$17.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$292K$292K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.3M$4.6M$6.9M$9.1M$9.1M$9.1M$9.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.3M$4.5M$6.8M$9.0M$9.0M$9.0M$9.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.9M$3.7M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$146K$292K$292K$292K$292K$292K$292K
Cumulative$0$6.5M$13.1M$19.5M$24.0M$24.0M$24.0M$24.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $24.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-50.1M$-50.1M-11.0%
Year 1$-51.6M+$16.0M$-35.6M-7.8%
Year 2$-53.2M+$24.0M$-29.1M-6.4%
Year 3$-54.8M+$24.0M$-30.7M-6.7%
Year 4$-56.4M+$24.0M$-32.4M-7.1%
Year 5$-58.1M+$24.0M$-34.1M-7.5%
$-501.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-374.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$126.4M
Value Created
$-34.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-79.8M
Organic Growth
$240.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-34.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.6M$6.9M$9.1M$11.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.5M$6.8M$9.0M$10.9M
A/R Days Reduction$2.8M$4.2M$5.6M$6.7M
Clean Claim Rate$146K$219K$292K$351K
Total$12.0M$18.0M$24.0M$28.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 98 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-11.0%-28.5%-17.8%-9.2%
P71
Net-to-Gross36.3%25.8%32.7%42.3%
P55
Occupancy96.3%59.3%73.5%83.2%
P93
Rev/Bed$1.8M$939K$1.5M$2.2M
P59
Exp/Bed$1.9M$978K$1.6M$2.4M
P62

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML