Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. JOSEPHS HOSPITAL HEALTH CENTER 2026-04-26 06:49 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. JOSEPHS HOSPITAL HEALTH CENTER
CCN 330140 | NY | 431 beds | Current EBITDA $-48.0M → Pro Forma $-20.1M (+$28.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$531.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-48.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$28.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-20.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$20.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$28.0M
Modeled Uplift
$18.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$9.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $18.7M (vs $28.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$10.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$10.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$340K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$28.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$10.6M$10.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$10.2M$292K$10.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.6M$4.8M$6.5M$20.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$340K$340K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.7M$5.3M$8.0M$10.6M$10.6M$10.6M$10.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.6M$5.3M$7.9M$10.5M$10.5M$10.5M$10.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.2M$4.3M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$170K$340K$340K$340K$340K$340K$340K
Cumulative$0$7.6M$15.2M$22.7M$28.0M$28.0M$28.0M$28.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $28.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-48.0M$-48.0M-9.0%
Year 1$-49.5M+$18.6M$-30.8M-5.8%
Year 2$-51.0M+$28.0M$-23.0M-4.3%
Year 3$-52.5M+$28.0M$-24.5M-4.6%
Year 4$-54.1M+$28.0M$-26.1M-4.9%
Year 5$-55.7M+$28.0M$-27.7M-5.2%
$-480.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$-305.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$175.3M
Value Created
$-27.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-76.5M
Organic Growth
$279.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-27.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.3M$8.0M$10.6M$12.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.3M$7.9M$10.5M$12.6M
A/R Days Reduction$3.2M$4.8M$6.5M$7.8M
Clean Claim Rate$170K$255K$340K$408K
Total$14.0M$21.0M$28.0M$33.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 66 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-9.0%-24.0%-17.5%-9.3%
P75
Net-to-Gross32.5%25.9%32.8%42.1%
P47
Occupancy65.5%67.8%79.2%88.1%
P20
Rev/Bed$1.2M$1.3M$1.8M$2.3M
P18
Exp/Bed$1.3M$1.3M$1.9M$2.6M
P24

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML