Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ROCHESTER GENERAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ROCHESTER GENERAL HOSPITAL
CCN 330125 | NY | 470 beds | Current EBITDA $-293.6M → Pro Forma $-238.2M (+$55.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.05B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-293.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$55.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-238.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$40.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$55.4M
Modeled Uplift
$41.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$14.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $41.1M (vs $55.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$21.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$20.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$12.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$674K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$55.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$21.1M$21.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$20.3M$579K$20.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$3.2M$9.6M$12.8M$40.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$674K$674K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$5.3M$10.5M$15.8M$21.1M$21.1M$21.1M$21.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$5.2M$10.4M$15.6M$20.9M$20.9M$20.9M$20.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$4.3M$8.5M$12.8M$12.8M$12.8M$12.8M$12.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$337K$674K$674K$674K$674K$674K$674K
Cumulative$0$15.1M$30.2M$44.9M$55.4M$55.4M$55.4M$55.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $55.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-293.6M$-293.6M-27.9%
Year 1$-302.4M+$36.9M$-265.4M-25.2%
Year 2$-311.4M+$55.4M$-256.0M-24.3%
Year 3$-320.8M+$55.4M$-265.4M-25.2%
Year 4$-330.4M+$55.4M$-275.0M-26.1%
Year 5$-340.3M+$55.4M$-284.9M-27.1%
$-2.94B
Entry EV (10x)
$-3.13B
Exit EV (11x)
$-198.5M
Value Created
$-284.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-467.6M
Organic Growth
$554.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-284.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$10.5M$15.8M$21.1M$25.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$10.4M$15.6M$20.9M$25.0M
A/R Days Reduction$6.4M$9.6M$12.8M$15.4M
Clean Claim Rate$337K$505K$674K$809K
Total$27.7M$41.6M$55.4M$66.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 63 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-27.9%-26.5%-17.6%-9.0%
P19
Net-to-Gross34.0%25.6%32.7%41.8%
P53
Occupancy95.6%67.1%79.3%87.9%
P89
Rev/Bed$2.2M$1.3M$1.8M$2.3M
P70
Exp/Bed$2.9M$1.3M$1.9M$2.6M
P81

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML