Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LINCOLN MEDICAL&MENTAL HEALTH CENTER 2026-04-26 09:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LINCOLN MEDICAL&MENTAL HEALTH CENTER
CCN 330080 | NY | 287 beds | Current EBITDA $-159.1M → Pro Forma $-122.6M (+$36.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$693.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-159.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$36.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-122.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$26.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$36.5M
Modeled Uplift
$26.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$10.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $26.5M (vs $36.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$13.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$13.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$444K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$36.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$13.9M$13.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$13.3M$381K$13.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.1M$6.3M$8.4M$26.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$444K$444K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.5M$6.9M$10.4M$13.9M$13.9M$13.9M$13.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.4M$6.9M$10.3M$13.7M$13.7M$13.7M$13.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.8M$5.6M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$222K$444K$444K$444K$444K$444K$444K
Cumulative$0$9.9M$19.9M$29.6M$36.5M$36.5M$36.5M$36.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $36.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-159.1M$-159.1M-22.9%
Year 1$-163.9M+$24.3M$-139.5M-20.1%
Year 2$-168.8M+$36.5M$-132.3M-19.1%
Year 3$-173.8M+$36.5M$-137.4M-19.8%
Year 4$-179.1M+$36.5M$-142.6M-20.6%
Year 5$-184.4M+$36.5M$-148.0M-21.3%
$-1.59B
Entry EV (10x)
$-1.63B
Exit EV (11x)
$-36.5M
Value Created
$-148.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-253.4M
Organic Growth
$364.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-148.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.9M$10.4M$13.9M$16.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.9M$10.3M$13.7M$16.5M
A/R Days Reduction$4.2M$6.3M$8.4M$10.1M
Clean Claim Rate$222K$333K$444K$533K
Total$18.2M$27.4M$36.5M$43.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 92 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-22.9%-27.8%-17.6%-9.0%
P30
Net-to-Gross42.6%25.7%32.7%42.6%
P74
Occupancy78.9%61.5%75.7%83.5%
P58
Rev/Bed$2.4M$1.0M$1.5M$2.2M
P84
Exp/Bed$3.0M$995K$1.7M$2.5M
P89

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML