Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SISTERS OF CHARITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 10:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SISTERS OF CHARITY HOSPITAL
CCN 330078 | NY | 398 beds | Current EBITDA $-103.2M → Pro Forma $-86.6M (+$16.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$314.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-103.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$16.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-86.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$12.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$16.5M
Modeled Uplift
$10.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.0M (vs $16.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$201K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$16.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.3M$6.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.1M$173K$6.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$965K$2.9M$3.8M$12.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$201K$201K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.6M$3.1M$4.7M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.6M$3.1M$4.7M$6.2M$6.2M$6.2M$6.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$101K$201K$201K$201K$201K$201K$201K
Cumulative$0$4.5M$9.0M$13.4M$16.5M$16.5M$16.5M$16.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $16.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-103.2M$-103.2M-32.8%
Year 1$-106.3M+$11.0M$-95.2M-30.3%
Year 2$-109.4M+$16.5M$-92.9M-29.5%
Year 3$-112.7M+$16.5M$-96.2M-30.6%
Year 4$-116.1M+$16.5M$-99.6M-31.7%
Year 5$-119.6M+$16.5M$-103.0M-32.8%
$-1.03B
Entry EV (10x)
$-1.13B
Exit EV (11x)
$-101.9M
Value Created
$-103.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-164.3M
Organic Growth
$165.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-103.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.1M$4.7M$6.3M$7.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.1M$4.7M$6.2M$7.5M
A/R Days Reduction$1.9M$2.9M$3.8M$4.6M
Clean Claim Rate$101K$151K$201K$242K
Total$8.3M$12.4M$16.5M$19.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 76 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-32.8%-26.5%-17.5%-9.3%
P13
Net-to-Gross43.9%25.5%33.4%42.5%
P81
Occupancy36.8%66.7%79.2%87.7%
P1
Rev/Bed$790K$1.3M$1.8M$2.3M
P9
Exp/Bed$1.0M$1.1M$1.9M$2.6M
P22

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML