Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NEWYORK-PRESBYTERIAN/QUEENS 2026-04-26 02:17 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NEWYORK-PRESBYTERIAN/QUEENS
CCN 330055 | NY | 476 beds | Current EBITDA $-522.4M → Pro Forma $-475.5M (+$46.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$890.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-522.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$46.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-475.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$34.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$46.8M
Modeled Uplift
$33.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$13.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $33.8M (vs $46.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$17.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$17.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$10.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$570K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$46.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$17.8M$17.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$17.1M$490K$17.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.7M$8.1M$10.8M$34.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$570K$570K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$4.5M$8.9M$13.4M$17.8M$17.8M$17.8M$17.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$4.4M$8.8M$13.2M$17.6M$17.6M$17.6M$17.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.6M$7.2M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$285K$570K$570K$570K$570K$570K$570K
Cumulative$0$12.8M$25.5M$38.0M$46.8M$46.8M$46.8M$46.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $46.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-522.4M$-522.4M-58.7%
Year 1$-538.0M+$31.2M$-506.8M-56.9%
Year 2$-554.2M+$46.8M$-507.3M-57.0%
Year 3$-570.8M+$46.8M$-524.0M-58.9%
Year 4$-587.9M+$46.8M$-541.1M-60.8%
Year 5$-605.6M+$46.8M$-558.7M-62.8%
$-5.22B
Entry EV (10x)
$-6.15B
Exit EV (11x)
$-922.4M
Value Created
$-558.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-832.0M
Organic Growth
$468.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-558.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$8.9M$13.4M$17.8M$21.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$8.8M$13.2M$17.6M$21.1M
A/R Days Reduction$5.4M$8.1M$10.8M$13.0M
Clean Claim Rate$285K$427K$570K$684K
Total$23.4M$35.1M$46.8M$56.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 62 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-26.5%-17.6%-9.0%
P0
Net-to-Gross24.7%25.6%32.7%41.8%
P21
Occupancy86.4%66.9%79.2%87.2%
P71
Rev/Bed$1.9M$1.3M$1.8M$2.3M
P53
Exp/Bed$3.0M$1.4M$2.0M$2.6M
P84

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML