Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MOUNT SINAI ST. LUKES ROOSEVELT HOS 2026-04-26 05:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MOUNT SINAI ST. LUKES ROOSEVELT HOS
CCN 330046 | NY | 618 beds | Current EBITDA $-292.7M → Pro Forma $-226.3M (+$66.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.26B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-292.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$66.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-226.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$48.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$66.4M
Modeled Uplift
$47.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$18.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $47.7M (vs $66.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$25.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$25.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$15.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$808K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$66.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$25.2M$25.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$24.3M$694K$25.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$3.9M$11.5M$15.4M$48.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$808K$808K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$6.3M$12.6M$18.9M$25.2M$25.2M$25.2M$25.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$6.2M$12.5M$18.7M$25.0M$25.0M$25.0M$25.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$5.1M$10.2M$15.4M$15.4M$15.4M$15.4M$15.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$404K$808K$808K$808K$808K$808K$808K
Cumulative$0$18.1M$36.2M$53.8M$66.4M$66.4M$66.4M$66.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $66.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-292.7M$-292.7M-23.2%
Year 1$-301.5M+$44.3M$-257.2M-20.4%
Year 2$-310.5M+$66.4M$-244.1M-19.3%
Year 3$-319.8M+$66.4M$-253.4M-20.1%
Year 4$-329.4M+$66.4M$-263.0M-20.8%
Year 5$-339.3M+$66.4M$-272.9M-21.6%
$-2.93B
Entry EV (10x)
$-3.00B
Exit EV (11x)
$-75.3M
Value Created
$-272.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-466.2M
Organic Growth
$663.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-272.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$12.6M$18.9M$25.2M$30.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$12.5M$18.7M$25.0M$30.0M
A/R Days Reduction$7.7M$11.5M$15.4M$18.4M
Clean Claim Rate$404K$606K$808K$969K
Total$33.2M$49.8M$66.4M$79.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 42 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-23.2%-29.0%-19.1%-8.3%
P35
Net-to-Gross23.5%24.9%30.7%41.2%
P12
Occupancy89.8%77.5%81.5%88.1%
P76
Rev/Bed$2.0M$1.4M$1.9M$2.5M
P52
Exp/Bed$2.5M$1.6M$2.3M$3.0M
P62

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML