Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — JAMAICA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:22 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — JAMAICA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 330014 | NY | 280 beds | Current EBITDA $-113.8M → Pro Forma $-81.7M (+$32.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$610.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-113.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$32.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-81.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$23.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$32.1M
Modeled Uplift
$22.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$9.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $22.9M (vs $32.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$12.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$12.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$7.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$391K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$32.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$12.2M$12.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$11.8M$336K$12.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.9M$5.6M$7.4M$23.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$391K$391K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.1M$6.1M$9.2M$12.2M$12.2M$12.2M$12.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.0M$6.0M$9.1M$12.1M$12.1M$12.1M$12.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.5M$5.0M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$195K$391K$391K$391K$391K$391K$391K
Cumulative$0$8.7M$17.5M$26.0M$32.1M$32.1M$32.1M$32.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $32.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-113.8M$-113.8M-18.6%
Year 1$-117.2M+$21.4M$-95.8M-15.7%
Year 2$-120.7M+$32.1M$-88.6M-14.5%
Year 3$-124.3M+$32.1M$-92.2M-15.1%
Year 4$-128.1M+$32.1M$-95.9M-15.7%
Year 5$-131.9M+$32.1M$-99.8M-16.3%
$-1.14B
Entry EV (10x)
$-1.10B
Exit EV (11x)
$40.1M
Value Created
$-99.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-181.2M
Organic Growth
$321.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-99.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.1M$9.2M$12.2M$14.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.0M$9.1M$12.1M$14.5M
A/R Days Reduction$3.7M$5.6M$7.4M$8.9M
Clean Claim Rate$195K$293K$391K$469K
Total$16.1M$24.1M$32.1M$38.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 95 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-18.6%-28.1%-17.7%-9.0%
P46
Net-to-Gross57.2%25.9%32.6%42.5%
P94
Occupancy76.6%61.4%76.4%84.2%
P51
Rev/Bed$2.2M$1.0M$1.5M$2.2M
P73
Exp/Bed$2.6M$994K$1.6M$2.5M
P77

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML