Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KALEIDA HEALTH 2026-04-26 06:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KALEIDA HEALTH
CCN 330005 | NY | 954 beds | Current EBITDA $-121.8M → Pro Forma $-49.0M (+$72.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.38B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-121.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$72.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-49.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$53.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$72.8M
Modeled Uplift
$48.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$24.8M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $48.0M (vs $72.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$27.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$27.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$16.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$885K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$72.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$27.7M$27.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$26.6M$761K$27.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$4.2M$12.6M$16.8M$53.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$885K$885K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$6.9M$13.8M$20.8M$27.7M$27.7M$27.7M$27.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$6.8M$13.7M$20.5M$27.4M$27.4M$27.4M$27.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$5.6M$11.2M$16.8M$16.8M$16.8M$16.8M$16.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$443K$885K$885K$885K$885K$885K$885K
Cumulative$0$19.8M$39.6M$59.0M$72.8M$72.8M$72.8M$72.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $72.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-121.8M$-121.8M-8.8%
Year 1$-125.5M+$48.5M$-76.9M-5.6%
Year 2$-129.2M+$72.8M$-56.4M-4.1%
Year 3$-133.1M+$72.8M$-60.3M-4.4%
Year 4$-137.1M+$72.8M$-64.3M-4.6%
Year 5$-141.2M+$72.8M$-68.4M-4.9%
$-1.22B
Entry EV (10x)
$-752.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$465.4M
Value Created
$-68.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-194.0M
Organic Growth
$727.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-68.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$13.8M$20.8M$27.7M$33.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$13.7M$20.5M$27.4M$32.9M
A/R Days Reduction$8.4M$12.6M$16.8M$20.2M
Clean Claim Rate$443K$664K$885K$1.1M
Total$36.4M$54.6M$72.8M$87.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 20 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-8.8%-28.4%-18.4%-7.1%
P65
Net-to-Gross33.5%24.0%27.9%34.4%
P70
Occupancy83.4%80.7%86.8%90.9%
P40
Rev/Bed$1.5M$1.5M$2.2M$2.7M
P20
Exp/Bed$1.6M$2.2M$2.6M$3.3M
P15

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML