Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HAVEN BEHAVIORAL SEN CARE OF ALBUQUR 2026-04-26 09:29 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HAVEN BEHAVIORAL SEN CARE OF ALBUQUR
CCN 324013 | NM | 48 beds | Current EBITDA $526K → Pro Forma $1.2M (+$632K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$11.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$526K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$632K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+529bps
Margin Improvement
$458K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$632K
Modeled Uplift
$449K
Risk-Adjusted
-$183K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$239K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$238K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$145K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$632K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$239K$239K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$230K$8K$238K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$37K$109K$145K$458K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$60K$119K$179K$239K$239K$239K$239K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$60K$119K$179K$238K$238K$238K$238K
A/R Days Reduction$0$48K$97K$145K$145K$145K$145K$145K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$172K$345K$512K$632K$632K$632K$632K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $632K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x70% / 14.0x74% / 15.9x78% / 17.8x80% / 18.8x82% / 19.8x
9.0x65% / 12.1x69% / 13.8x73% / 15.5x75% / 16.4x77% / 17.2x
10.0x60% / 10.6x65% / 12.1x69% / 13.6x70% / 14.4x72% / 15.2x
11.0x56% / 9.3x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.8x68% / 13.5x
12.0x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.7x
Headroom (turns)
41%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 41% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.8x, adding 4.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$526K$526K4.4%
Year 1$542K+$421K$963K8.1%
Year 2$558K+$632K$1.2M10.0%
Year 3$575K+$632K$1.2M10.1%
Year 4$592K+$632K$1.2M10.3%
Year 5$610K+$632K$1.2M10.4%
$5.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$13.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$8.4M
Value Created
$1.2M
Exit EBITDA
$838K
Organic Growth
$6.3M
RCM Value Creation
$1.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$119K$179K$239K$286K
Denial Rate Reductio$119K$179K$238K$286K
A/R Days Reduction$73K$109K$145K$174K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$316K$474K$632K$758K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 35 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.4%-20.3%-2.7%8.8%
P59
Net-to-Gross47.5%24.1%38.6%49.7%
P69
Occupancy77.6%21.4%42.2%64.3%
P86
Rev/Bed$249K$603K$971K$2.3M
P0
Exp/Bed$238K$637K$1.5M$2.5M
P0

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML