Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BHC MESILLA VALLEY HOSPITAL LLC 2026-04-26 09:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BHC MESILLA VALLEY HOSPITAL LLC
CCN 324010 | NM | 120 beds | Current EBITDA $4.2M → Pro Forma $5.6M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$25.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$966K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$912K
Risk-Adjusted
-$412K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$503K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$498K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$306K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$16K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$503K$503K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$485K$14K$498K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$77K$229K$306K$966K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$16K$16K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$126K$252K$378K$503K$503K$503K$503K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$125K$249K$374K$498K$498K$498K$498K
A/R Days Reduction$0$102K$204K$306K$306K$306K$306K$306K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K
Cumulative$0$361K$721K$1.1M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
9.0x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.4x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x
10.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x52% / 8.2x
11.0x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x
12.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.1x
Headroom (turns)
1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.4x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.2M$4.2M16.8%
Year 1$4.4M+$883K$5.2M20.8%
Year 2$4.5M+$1.3M$5.8M23.1%
Year 3$4.6M+$1.3M$6.0M23.6%
Year 4$4.8M+$1.3M$6.1M24.2%
Year 5$4.9M+$1.3M$6.2M24.8%
$42.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$68.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$26.2M
Value Created
$6.2M
Exit EBITDA
$6.7M
Organic Growth
$13.2M
RCM Value Creation
$6.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$252K$378K$503K$604K
Denial Rate Reductio$249K$374K$498K$598K
A/R Days Reduction$153K$230K$306K$368K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$16K$19K
Total$662K$993K$1.3M$1.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 17 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin16.8%-3.2%6.7%10.5%
P80
Net-to-Gross27.2%19.6%28.4%38.7%
P40
Occupancy67.4%43.4%51.8%67.3%
P76
Rev/Bed$210K$511K$1.2M$1.7M
P0
Exp/Bed$174K$449K$1.2M$1.9M
P0

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML