Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LOVELACE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:08 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LOVELACE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL
CCN 323028 | NM | 58 beds | Current EBITDA $12.0M → Pro Forma $14.9M (+$2.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$54.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$12.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$14.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$2.9M
Modeled Uplift
$2.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$746K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.1M (vs $2.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$667K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$35K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.1M$1.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.1M$30K$1.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$168K$499K$667K$2.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$35K$35K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT47.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$274K$548K$822K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$271K$543K$814K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$222K$445K$667K$667K$667K$667K$667K
Clean Claim Rate$0$18K$35K$35K$35K$35K$35K$35K
Cumulative$0$786K$1.6M$2.3M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x
9.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
10.0x38% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x
11.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x
12.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.3x38% / 5.1x40% / 5.5x42% / 5.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.3x
Headroom (turns)
-5%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -5% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.8x, adding 1.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$12.0M$12.0M22.0%
Year 1$12.4M+$1.9M$14.3M26.1%
Year 2$12.8M+$2.9M$15.7M28.6%
Year 3$13.2M+$2.9M$16.0M29.3%
Year 4$13.6M+$2.9M$16.4M30.0%
Year 5$14.0M+$2.9M$16.8M30.7%
$120.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$185.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$64.9M
Value Created
$16.8M
Exit EBITDA
$19.2M
Organic Growth
$28.8M
RCM Value Creation
$16.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$548K$822K$1.1M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$543K$814K$1.1M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$334K$500K$667K$801K
Clean Claim Rate$18K$26K$35K$42K
Total$1.4M$2.2M$2.9M$3.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 23 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin22.0%-11.9%4.4%8.9%
P90
Net-to-Gross25.8%21.3%33.1%47.5%
P33
Occupancy84.7%25.8%49.5%75.3%
P87
Rev/Bed$945K$471K$851K$1.2M
P57
Exp/Bed$738K$448K$1.1M$1.7M
P43

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML