Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LINCOLN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 17:21 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LINCOLN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 321306 | NM | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $2.7M → Pro Forma $6.2M (+$3.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$66.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$3.5M
Modeled Uplift
$2.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.1M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.4M (vs $3.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$811K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$43K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.3M$1.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.3M$37K$1.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$205K$607K$811K$2.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$43K$43K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$333K$667K$1000K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$330K$660K$990K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$270K$541K$811K$811K$811K$811K$811K
Clean Claim Rate$0$21K$43K$43K$43K$43K$43K$43K
Cumulative$0$955K$1.9M$2.8M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x71% / 14.6x75% / 16.6x79% / 18.6x81% / 19.5x83% / 20.5x
9.0x66% / 12.6x70% / 14.4x74% / 16.1x76% / 17.0x78% / 17.9x
10.0x62% / 11.0x66% / 12.6x70% / 14.2x72% / 15.0x74% / 15.8x
11.0x58% / 9.7x62% / 11.2x66% / 12.6x68% / 13.3x70% / 14.1x
12.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 10.0x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.8x
Headroom (turns)
43%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 43% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.7x, adding 4.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.7M$2.7M4.1%
Year 1$2.8M+$2.3M$5.2M7.7%
Year 2$2.9M+$3.5M$6.4M9.6%
Year 3$3.0M+$3.5M$6.5M9.8%
Year 4$3.1M+$3.5M$6.6M9.9%
Year 5$3.2M+$3.5M$6.7M10.0%
$27.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$73.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$46.1M
Value Created
$6.7M
Exit EBITDA
$4.4M
Organic Growth
$35.1M
RCM Value Creation
$6.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$667K$1000K$1.3M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$660K$990K$1.3M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$406K$608K$811K$973K
Clean Claim Rate$21K$32K$43K$51K
Total$1.8M$2.6M$3.5M$4.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 26 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.1%-28.3%-7.2%4.6%
P67
Net-to-Gross51.4%28.8%43.9%50.3%
P75
Occupancy46.0%17.9%29.2%51.9%
P65
Rev/Bed$2.7M$517K$971K$2.4M
P83
Exp/Bed$2.6M$614K$1.7M$2.5M
P73

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML