Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UNION COUNTY GEN. HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 15:51 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UNION COUNTY GEN. HOSPITAL
CCN 321304 | NM | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-4.8M → Pro Forma $-4.3M (+$553K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$10.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-4.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$553K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-4.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+531bps
Margin Improvement
$399K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

59%
Realization (C)
$553K
Modeled Uplift
$326K
Risk-Adjusted
-$227K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 59% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$209K
+200bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$208K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$127K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+9bp
Total EBITDA Impact$553K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$200K$8K$209K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$208K$208K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$32K$95K$127K$399K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$52K$104K$156K$209K$209K$209K$209K
Cost to Collect$0$52K$104K$156K$208K$208K$208K$208K
A/R Days Reduction$0$42K$84K$127K$127K$127K$127K$127K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$151K$302K$449K$553K$553K$553K$553K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $553K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-4.8M$-4.8M-46.2%
Year 1$-5.0M+$369K$-4.6M-44.1%
Year 2$-5.1M+$553K$-4.6M-43.7%
Year 3$-5.3M+$553K$-4.7M-45.2%
Year 4$-5.4M+$553K$-4.9M-46.7%
Year 5$-5.6M+$553K$-5.0M-48.3%
$-48.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-55.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$-7.2M
Value Created
$-5.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-7.7M
Organic Growth
$5.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-5.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$104K$156K$209K$250K
Cost to Collect$104K$156K$208K$250K
A/R Days Reduction$63K$95K$127K$152K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$276K$415K$553K$663K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 26 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-46.2%-28.3%-7.2%4.6%
P17
Net-to-Gross57.3%28.8%43.9%50.3%
P83
Occupancy8.4%17.9%29.2%51.9%
P4
Rev/Bed$416K$517K$971K$2.4M
P8
Exp/Bed$609K$614K$1.7M$2.5M
P19

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML