Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LOVELACE REGIONAL HOSPITAL-ROSWELL 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LOVELACE REGIONAL HOSPITAL-ROSWELL
CCN 320086 | NM | 27 beds | Current EBITDA $5.9M → Pro Forma $9.2M (+$3.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$63.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$3.3M
Modeled Uplift
$2.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.0M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.3M (vs $3.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$768K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$40K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.3M$1.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.2M$35K$1.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$194K$574K$768K$2.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$40K$40K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$315K$631K$946K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$312K$625K$937K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$256K$512K$768K$768K$768K$768K$768K
Clean Claim Rate$0$20K$40K$40K$40K$40K$40K$40K
Cumulative$0$904K$1.8M$2.7M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x56% / 9.3x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.8x68% / 13.6x
9.0x51% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.1x63% / 11.7x
10.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 8.0x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x
11.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
12.0x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.1x
Headroom (turns)
17%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 17% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.4x, adding 3.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.9M$5.9M9.3%
Year 1$6.1M+$2.2M$8.3M13.1%
Year 2$6.3M+$3.3M$9.6M15.2%
Year 3$6.4M+$3.3M$9.8M15.5%
Year 4$6.6M+$3.3M$10.0M15.8%
Year 5$6.8M+$3.3M$10.2M16.1%
$58.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$111.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$52.7M
Value Created
$10.2M
Exit EBITDA
$9.4M
Organic Growth
$33.2M
RCM Value Creation
$10.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$631K$946K$1.3M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$625K$937K$1.2M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$384K$576K$768K$921K
Clean Claim Rate$20K$30K$40K$48K
Total$1.7M$2.5M$3.3M$4.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 27 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin9.3%-26.5%-3.6%5.0%
P80
Net-to-Gross18.6%24.2%43.7%49.9%
P8
Occupancy52.6%18.3%31.9%51.1%
P74
Rev/Bed$2.3M$523K$984K$2.3M
P72
Exp/Bed$2.1M$619K$1.6M$2.5M
P67

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML