Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CARLSBAD MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 14:08 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CARLSBAD MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 320063 | NM | 53 beds | Current EBITDA $19.3M → Pro Forma $24.4M (+$5.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$97.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$19.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$24.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$5.1M
Modeled Uplift
$3.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.3M (vs $5.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$62K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.9M$1.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.9M$53K$1.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$298K$884K$1.2M$3.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$62K$62K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$486K$971K$1.5M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$481K$962K$1.4M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$394K$788K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$31K$62K$62K$62K$62K$62K$62K
Cumulative$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x60% / 10.6x
9.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x
10.0x38% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x
11.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
12.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.2x
Headroom (turns)
-3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.7x, adding 1.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$19.3M$19.3M19.9%
Year 1$19.9M+$3.4M$23.3M24.0%
Year 2$20.5M+$5.1M$25.6M26.3%
Year 3$21.1M+$5.1M$26.2M27.0%
Year 4$21.7M+$5.1M$26.8M27.6%
Year 5$22.4M+$5.1M$27.5M28.3%
$192.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$302.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$109.3M
Value Created
$27.5M
Exit EBITDA
$30.7M
Organic Growth
$51.1M
RCM Value Creation
$27.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$971K$1.5M$1.9M$2.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$962K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M
A/R Days Reduction$591K$886K$1.2M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$31K$47K$62K$75K
Total$2.6M$3.8M$5.1M$6.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 25 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin19.9%-11.8%4.7%9.2%
P86
Net-to-Gross21.3%19.7%33.1%46.3%
P27
Occupancy34.5%25.0%49.5%73.4%
P32
Rev/Bed$1.8M$484K$893K$1.2M
P82
Exp/Bed$1.5M$455K$1.1M$1.9M
P56

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML