Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LOVELACE WOMENS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 11:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LOVELACE WOMENS HOSPITAL
CCN 320017 | NM | 162 beds | Current EBITDA $15.6M → Pro Forma $26.1M (+$10.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$198.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$15.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$10.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$26.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$10.5M
Modeled Uplift
$7.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.5M
Execution Discount
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Payer Diversity, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.0M (vs $10.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$127K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$10.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.0M$4.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.8M$109K$3.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$610K$1.8M$2.4M$7.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$127K$127K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$994K$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$984K$2.0M$3.0M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$806K$1.6M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$64K$127K$127K$127K$127K$127K$127K
Cumulative$0$2.8M$5.7M$8.5M$10.5M$10.5M$10.5M$10.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $10.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.6x67% / 13.1x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.6x
9.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 10.0x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x
10.0x49% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x
11.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x
12.0x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.4x
Headroom (turns)
22%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 22% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.1x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$15.6M$15.6M7.9%
Year 1$16.1M+$7.0M$23.0M11.6%
Year 2$16.6M+$10.5M$27.0M13.6%
Year 3$17.1M+$10.5M$27.5M13.8%
Year 4$17.6M+$10.5M$28.0M14.1%
Year 5$18.1M+$10.5M$28.6M14.4%
$156.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$314.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$158.0M
Value Created
$28.6M
Exit EBITDA
$24.9M
Organic Growth
$104.6M
RCM Value Creation
$28.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.0M$3.0M$3.9M$4.7M
A/R Days Reduction$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
Clean Claim Rate$64K$95K$127K$153K
Total$5.2M$7.8M$10.5M$12.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 12 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.9%-2.1%8.3%13.3%
P42
Net-to-Gross15.8%16.5%24.2%32.7%
P17
Occupancy51.4%49.9%57.8%65.1%
P25
Rev/Bed$1.2M$609K$1.2M$1.6M
P58
Exp/Bed$1.1M$417K$1.1M$1.4M
P42

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML