Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LOVELACE MEDICAL CENTER- DOWNTOWN 2026-04-26 10:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LOVELACE MEDICAL CENTER- DOWNTOWN
CCN 320009 | NM | 286 beds | Current EBITDA $-37.9M → Pro Forma $-20.1M (+$17.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$338.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-37.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$17.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-20.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$13.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$17.8M
Modeled Uplift
$12.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $12.2M (vs $17.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$217K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$17.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.8M$6.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.5M$186K$6.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.0M$3.1M$4.1M$13.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$217K$217K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.1M$6.8M$6.8M$6.8M$6.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.7M$3.3M$5.0M$6.7M$6.7M$6.7M$6.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.4M$2.7M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$108K$217K$217K$217K$217K$217K$217K
Cumulative$0$4.8M$9.7M$14.4M$17.8M$17.8M$17.8M$17.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $17.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-37.9M$-37.9M-11.2%
Year 1$-39.0M+$11.9M$-27.1M-8.0%
Year 2$-40.2M+$17.8M$-22.4M-6.6%
Year 3$-41.4M+$17.8M$-23.6M-7.0%
Year 4$-42.6M+$17.8M$-24.8M-7.3%
Year 5$-43.9M+$17.8M$-26.1M-7.7%
$-378.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-287.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$91.6M
Value Created
$-26.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-60.3M
Organic Growth
$178.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-26.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.4M$5.1M$6.8M$8.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.3M$5.0M$6.7M$8.0M
A/R Days Reduction$2.1M$3.1M$4.1M$4.9M
Clean Claim Rate$108K$162K$217K$260K
Total$8.9M$13.4M$17.8M$21.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 1556 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-11.2%-13.4%-3.9%5.6%
P30
Net-to-Gross13.7%18.5%25.4%33.3%
P12
Occupancy63.0%55.5%68.1%77.5%
P39
Rev/Bed$1.2M$1.0M$1.4M$1.9M
P33
Exp/Bed$1.3M$956K$1.5M$2.0M
P42

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML