Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — EASTERN NEW MEXICO MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — EASTERN NEW MEXICO MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 320006 | NM | 120 beds | Current EBITDA $64.0M → Pro Forma $70.2M (+$6.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$117.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$64.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$70.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$6.2M
Modeled Uplift
$4.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.1M (vs $6.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$75K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.4M$2.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.3M$65K$2.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$362K$1.1M$1.4M$4.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$75K$75K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$589K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$583K$1.2M$1.7M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$478K$956K$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$38K$75K$75K$75K$75K$75K$75K
Cumulative$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.0M$6.2M$6.2M$6.2M$6.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 7.0x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
9.0x38% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x
10.0x33% / 4.1x38% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x
11.0x28% / 3.4x33% / 4.2x38% / 4.9x40% / 5.3x41% / 5.7x
12.0x24% / 2.9x29% / 3.6x33% / 4.2x36% / 4.6x38% / 4.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
-1.2x
Headroom (turns)
-19%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -19% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.7x, adding 0.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$64.0M$64.0M54.3%
Year 1$65.9M+$4.1M$70.0M59.4%
Year 2$67.9M+$6.2M$74.1M62.9%
Year 3$69.9M+$6.2M$76.1M64.6%
Year 4$72.0M+$6.2M$78.2M66.4%
Year 5$74.2M+$6.2M$80.4M68.2%
$639.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$884.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$244.3M
Value Created
$80.4M
Exit EBITDA
$101.9M
Organic Growth
$62.0M
RCM Value Creation
$80.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.2M$1.7M$2.3M$2.8M
A/R Days Reduction$717K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M
Clean Claim Rate$38K$57K$75K$90K
Total$3.1M$4.6M$6.2M$7.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 17 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin54.3%-3.2%6.7%10.5%
P93
Net-to-Gross16.7%19.6%28.4%38.7%
P13
Occupancy45.6%43.4%51.8%67.3%
P29
Rev/Bed$982K$511K$1.2M$1.7M
P33
Exp/Bed$449K$449K$1.2M$1.9M
P24

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML