Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HOSPITAL
CCN 320001 | NM | 554 beds | Current EBITDA $-200.1M → Pro Forma $-131.4M (+$68.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.31B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-200.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$68.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-131.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$50.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$68.7M
Modeled Uplift
$48.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$19.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $48.9M (vs $68.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$26.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$25.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$15.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$836K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$68.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$26.1M$26.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$25.2M$719K$25.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$4.0M$11.9M$15.9M$50.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$836K$836K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$6.5M$13.1M$19.6M$26.1M$26.1M$26.1M$26.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$6.5M$12.9M$19.4M$25.9M$25.9M$25.9M$25.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$5.3M$10.6M$15.9M$15.9M$15.9M$15.9M$15.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$418K$836K$836K$836K$836K$836K$836K
Cumulative$0$18.7M$37.4M$55.7M$68.7M$68.7M$68.7M$68.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $68.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-200.1M$-200.1M-15.3%
Year 1$-206.1M+$45.8M$-160.3M-12.3%
Year 2$-212.3M+$68.7M$-143.6M-11.0%
Year 3$-218.7M+$68.7M$-149.9M-11.5%
Year 4$-225.2M+$68.7M$-156.5M-12.0%
Year 5$-232.0M+$68.7M$-163.3M-12.5%
$-2.00B
Entry EV (10x)
$-1.80B
Exit EV (11x)
$205.5M
Value Created
$-163.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-318.7M
Organic Growth
$687.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-163.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$13.1M$19.6M$26.1M$31.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$12.9M$19.4M$25.9M$31.0M
A/R Days Reduction$8.0M$11.9M$15.9M$19.1M
Clean Claim Rate$418K$627K$836K$1.0M
Total$34.4M$51.6M$68.7M$82.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 799 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-15.3%-14.5%-4.5%4.8%
P23
Net-to-Gross53.4%19.0%25.5%32.1%
P94
Occupancy86.6%63.2%73.4%81.1%
P86
Rev/Bed$2.4M$1.2M$1.6M$2.2M
P78
Exp/Bed$2.7M$1.2M$1.7M$2.3M
P83

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML