Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEADOWVIEW PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEADOWVIEW PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL
CCN 314024 | NJ | 84 beds | Current EBITDA $-4.7M → Pro Forma $-3.2M (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$28.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-4.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-3.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$418K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$566K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$560K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$344K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$18K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$566K$566K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$545K$16K$560K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$87K$257K$344K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$18K$18K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$141K$283K$424K$566K$566K$566K$566K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$140K$280K$420K$560K$560K$560K$560K
A/R Days Reduction$0$115K$230K$344K$344K$344K$344K$344K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K
Cumulative$0$405K$811K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-4.7M$-4.7M-16.6%
Year 1$-4.8M+$992K$-3.8M-13.6%
Year 2$-5.0M+$1.5M$-3.5M-12.3%
Year 3$-5.1M+$1.5M$-3.6M-12.8%
Year 4$-5.3M+$1.5M$-3.8M-13.4%
Year 5$-5.4M+$1.5M$-3.9M-13.9%
$-46.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-43.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$3.5M
Value Created
$-3.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-7.5M
Organic Growth
$14.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-3.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$283K$424K$566K$679K
Denial Rate Reductio$280K$420K$560K$672K
A/R Days Reduction$172K$258K$344K$413K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$14K$18K$22K
Total$744K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 41 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-16.6%-34.4%-6.7%1.8%
P39
Net-to-Gross100.0%13.6%18.2%44.6%
P93
Occupancy90.0%49.7%55.6%73.5%
P93
Rev/Bed$337K$414K$723K$1.4M
P15
Exp/Bed$393K$472K$1.1M$1.5M
P7

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML