Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ASPEN HILLS HEALTHCARE CENTER 2026-04-26 05:23 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ASPEN HILLS HEALTHCARE CENTER
CCN 314023 | NJ | 30 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.3M → Pro Forma $-2.0M (+$1.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$26.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$1.4M
Modeled Uplift
$967K
Risk-Adjusted
-$413K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$525K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$519K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$319K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$17K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$525K$525K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$505K$14K$519K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$81K$239K$319K$1.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$17K$17K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT75.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$131K$262K$394K$525K$525K$525K$525K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$130K$260K$390K$519K$519K$519K$519K
A/R Days Reduction$0$106K$213K$319K$319K$319K$319K$319K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K
Cumulative$0$376K$752K$1.1M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.3M$-3.3M-12.7%
Year 1$-3.4M+$920K$-2.5M-9.6%
Year 2$-3.5M+$1.4M$-2.2M-8.3%
Year 3$-3.7M+$1.4M$-2.3M-8.7%
Year 4$-3.8M+$1.4M$-2.4M-9.1%
Year 5$-3.9M+$1.4M$-2.5M-9.5%
$-33.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$-27.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$6.0M
Value Created
$-2.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-5.3M
Organic Growth
$13.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-2.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$262K$394K$525K$630K
Denial Rate Reductio$260K$390K$519K$623K
A/R Days Reduction$160K$239K$319K$383K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$13K$17K$20K
Total$690K$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 11 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-12.7%-22.4%-4.9%16.3%
P30
Net-to-Gross93.2%49.0%61.4%75.2%
P80
Occupancy75.0%59.2%71.5%75.3%
P64
Rev/Bed$875K$414K$546K$683K
P80
Exp/Bed$986K$433K$495K$804K
P73

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML