Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HAMPTON HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:32 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HAMPTON HOSPITAL
CCN 314021 | NJ | 120 beds | Current EBITDA $810K → Pro Forma $2.5M (+$1.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$33.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$810K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$1.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$509K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.2M (vs $1.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$659K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$652K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$401K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$21K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$659K$659K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$634K$18K$652K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$101K$300K$401K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$21K$21K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$165K$330K$494K$659K$659K$659K$659K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$163K$326K$489K$652K$652K$652K$652K
A/R Days Reduction$0$134K$267K$401K$401K$401K$401K$401K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K
Cumulative$0$472K$944K$1.4M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x84% / 20.9x88% / 23.6x92% / 26.2x94% / 27.6x96% / 28.9x
9.0x79% / 18.2x83% / 20.6x87% / 23.0x89% / 24.1x91% / 25.3x
10.0x74% / 16.1x79% / 18.2x83% / 20.3x85% / 21.4x86% / 22.5x
11.0x70% / 14.3x75% / 16.2x79% / 18.2x81% / 19.2x82% / 20.1x
12.0x67% / 12.8x71% / 14.6x75% / 16.4x77% / 17.3x79% / 18.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.8x
Headroom (turns)
59%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 59% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.7x, adding 5.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$810K$810K2.5%
Year 1$835K+$1.2M$2.0M6.0%
Year 2$860K+$1.7M$2.6M7.9%
Year 3$885K+$1.7M$2.6M7.9%
Year 4$912K+$1.7M$2.6M8.0%
Year 5$939K+$1.7M$2.7M8.1%
$8.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$29.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$21.3M
Value Created
$2.7M
Exit EBITDA
$1.3M
Organic Growth
$17.3M
RCM Value Creation
$2.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$330K$494K$659K$791K
Denial Rate Reductio$326K$489K$652K$783K
A/R Days Reduction$200K$301K$401K$481K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$16K$21K$25K
Total$867K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 53 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.5%-25.5%-6.7%2.1%
P77
Net-to-Gross49.2%14.3%20.2%35.9%
P83
Occupancy78.6%50.2%56.5%73.5%
P81
Rev/Bed$275K$480K$1.0M$1.4M
P6
Exp/Bed$268K$527K$1.1M$1.6M
P2

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML