Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TRENTON PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 08:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TRENTON PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL
CCN 314013 | NJ | 400 beds | Current EBITDA $312K → Pro Forma $531K (+$218K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$3.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$312K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$218K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$531K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+560bps
Margin Improvement
$150K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$218K
Modeled Uplift
$143K
Risk-Adjusted
-$76K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.1M (vs $0.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$83K
+214bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$78K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$47K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+25bp
Total EBITDA Impact$218K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$75K$8K$83K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$78K$78K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$12K$36K$47K$150K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$21K$42K$63K$83K$83K$83K$83K
Cost to Collect$0$20K$39K$59K$78K$78K$78K$78K
A/R Days Reduction$0$16K$32K$47K$47K$47K$47K$47K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$61K$122K$178K$218K$218K$218K$218K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $218K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x60% / 10.3x64% / 11.9x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.1x72% / 14.9x
9.0x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x
10.0x50% / 7.6x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.1x60% / 10.7x62% / 11.2x
11.0x46% / 6.6x51% / 7.7x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x
12.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.5x
Headroom (turns)
23%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 23% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.0x, adding 3.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$312K$312K8.0%
Year 1$322K+$146K$467K12.0%
Year 2$331K+$218K$550K14.1%
Year 3$341K+$218K$560K14.3%
Year 4$351K+$218K$570K14.6%
Year 5$362K+$218K$580K14.9%
$3.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$6.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$3.3M
Value Created
$580K
Exit EBITDA
$497K
Organic Growth
$2.2M
RCM Value Creation
$580K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$42K$63K$83K$100K
Cost to Collect$39K$59K$78K$94K
A/R Days Reduction$24K$36K$47K$57K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$109K$164K$218K$262K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 40 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-11.1%-3.5%2.4%
P0
Net-to-Gross100.0%19.7%21.8%25.7%
P92
Occupancy75.0%60.1%69.8%77.9%
P55
Rev/Bed$10K$1.2M$1.6M$2.0M
P2
Exp/Bed$244K$1.3M$1.5M$2.0M
P2

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML