Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SUMMIT OAKS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SUMMIT OAKS HOSPITAL
CCN 314001 | NJ | 124 beds | Current EBITDA $-212K → Pro Forma $1.4M (+$1.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$31.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-212K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$1.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$487K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.2M (vs $1.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$629K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$622K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$383K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$20K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$629K$629K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$605K$17K$622K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$96K$286K$383K$1.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$20K$20K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT26.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$157K$314K$472K$629K$629K$629K$629K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$156K$311K$467K$622K$622K$622K$622K
A/R Days Reduction$0$128K$255K$383K$383K$383K$383K$383K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$20K$20K$20K$20K$20K$20K
Cumulative$0$450K$901K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-1.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
7.7x
Headroom (turns)
119%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 119% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -1.2x, adding 100.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-212K$-212K-0.7%
Year 1$-218K+$1.1M$884K2.8%
Year 2$-225K+$1.7M$1.4M4.5%
Year 3$-232K+$1.7M$1.4M4.5%
Year 4$-239K+$1.7M$1.4M4.5%
Year 5$-246K+$1.7M$1.4M4.5%
$-2.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$15.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$17.6M
Value Created
$1.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-338K
Organic Growth
$16.5M
RCM Value Creation
$1.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$314K$472K$629K$754K
Denial Rate Reductio$311K$467K$622K$747K
A/R Days Reduction$191K$287K$383K$459K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$15K$20K$24K
Total$827K$1.2M$1.7M$2.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 50 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-0.7%-25.3%-8.2%1.7%
P62
Net-to-Gross44.6%14.2%20.0%26.2%
P82
Occupancy78.0%50.2%56.1%72.1%
P80
Rev/Bed$254K$482K$1.1M$1.5M
P2
Exp/Bed$255K$540K$1.2M$1.6M
P0

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML