Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHILDRENS SPECIALIZED HOPSITAL 2026-04-26 09:34 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHILDRENS SPECIALIZED HOPSITAL
CCN 313300 | NJ | 68 beds | Current EBITDA $-27.2M → Pro Forma $-19.3M (+$7.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$150.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-27.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-19.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$7.9M
Modeled Uplift
$5.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.8M (vs $7.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$96K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.0M$3.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.9M$83K$3.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$461K$1.4M$1.8M$5.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$96K$96K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT55.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$751K$1.5M$2.3M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$743K$1.5M$2.2M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$609K$1.2M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$48K$96K$96K$96K$96K$96K$96K
Cumulative$0$2.2M$4.3M$6.4M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-27.2M$-27.2M-18.1%
Year 1$-28.0M+$5.3M$-22.7M-15.1%
Year 2$-28.8M+$7.9M$-20.9M-13.9%
Year 3$-29.7M+$7.9M$-21.8M-14.5%
Year 4$-30.6M+$7.9M$-22.7M-15.1%
Year 5$-31.5M+$7.9M$-23.6M-15.7%
$-271.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$-259.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$12.1M
Value Created
$-23.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-43.3M
Organic Growth
$79.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-23.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.5M$2.3M$3.0M$3.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.5M$2.2M$3.0M$3.6M
A/R Days Reduction$913K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M
Clean Claim Rate$48K$72K$96K$115K
Total$3.9M$5.9M$7.9M$9.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 33 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-18.1%-27.1%-3.8%2.8%
P36
Net-to-Gross55.2%14.8%26.4%55.2%
P73
Occupancy80.5%50.2%58.1%75.7%
P82
Rev/Bed$2.2M$376K$520K$1.3M
P94
Exp/Bed$2.6M$434K$529K$1.5M
P94

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML