Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MATHENY SCHOOL & HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MATHENY SCHOOL & HOSPITAL
CCN 312014 | NJ | 101 beds | Current EBITDA $-19.9M → Pro Forma $-17.9M (+$2.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$38.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-19.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-17.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$2.0M
Modeled Uplift
$1.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$511K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.5M (vs $2.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$759K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$752K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$462K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$24K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$759K$759K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$731K$21K$752K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$116K$345K$462K$1.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$24K$24K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$190K$380K$569K$759K$759K$759K$759K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$188K$376K$564K$752K$752K$752K$752K
A/R Days Reduction$0$154K$308K$462K$462K$462K$462K$462K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K
Cumulative$0$544K$1.1M$1.6M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-19.9M$-19.9M-52.3%
Year 1$-20.5M+$1.3M$-19.1M-50.4%
Year 2$-21.1M+$2.0M$-19.1M-50.3%
Year 3$-21.7M+$2.0M$-19.7M-51.9%
Year 4$-22.4M+$2.0M$-20.4M-53.6%
Year 5$-23.0M+$2.0M$-21.0M-55.4%
$-198.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-231.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$-32.7M
Value Created
$-21.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-31.6M
Organic Growth
$20.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-21.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$380K$569K$759K$911K
Denial Rate Reductio$376K$564K$752K$902K
A/R Days Reduction$231K$346K$462K$554K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$18K$24K$29K
Total$999K$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 48 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-27.2%-8.2%2.4%
P0
Net-to-Gross100.0%14.3%20.5%37.0%
P94
Occupancy97.9%49.7%55.5%71.7%
P98
Rev/Bed$376K$480K$875K$1.4M
P19
Exp/Bed$573K$527K$1.1M$1.5M
P31

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML