Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UH - UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:23 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UH - UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
CCN 310119 | NJ | 358 beds | Current EBITDA $-192.9M → Pro Forma $-156.0M (+$36.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$702.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-192.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$36.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-156.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$26.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$36.9M
Modeled Uplift
$27.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$9.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $27.1M (vs $36.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$14.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$13.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$449K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$36.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$14.0M$14.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$13.5M$386K$13.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.2M$6.4M$8.5M$26.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$449K$449K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.5M$7.0M$10.5M$14.0M$14.0M$14.0M$14.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.5M$7.0M$10.4M$13.9M$13.9M$13.9M$13.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.8M$5.7M$8.5M$8.5M$8.5M$8.5M$8.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$225K$449K$449K$449K$449K$449K$449K
Cumulative$0$10.1M$20.1M$29.9M$36.9M$36.9M$36.9M$36.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $36.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-192.9M$-192.9M-27.5%
Year 1$-198.7M+$24.6M$-174.1M-24.8%
Year 2$-204.7M+$36.9M$-167.7M-23.9%
Year 3$-210.8M+$36.9M$-173.9M-24.8%
Year 4$-217.1M+$36.9M$-180.2M-25.7%
Year 5$-223.6M+$36.9M$-186.7M-26.6%
$-1.93B
Entry EV (10x)
$-2.05B
Exit EV (11x)
$-124.6M
Value Created
$-186.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-307.2M
Organic Growth
$369.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-186.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$7.0M$10.5M$14.0M$16.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$7.0M$10.4M$13.9M$16.7M
A/R Days Reduction$4.3M$6.4M$8.5M$10.3M
Clean Claim Rate$225K$337K$449K$539K
Total$18.5M$27.7M$36.9M$44.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 46 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-27.5%-11.7%-3.5%2.6%
P7
Net-to-Gross21.7%19.3%21.7%25.5%
P50
Occupancy86.6%59.2%66.4%77.0%
P89
Rev/Bed$2.0M$1.2M$1.5M$1.9M
P78
Exp/Bed$2.5M$1.2M$1.5M$2.0M
P91

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML