Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BAYSHORE MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BAYSHORE MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 310112 | NJ | 175 beds | Current EBITDA $4.0M → Pro Forma $13.8M (+$9.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$186.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$9.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$13.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$9.8M
Modeled Uplift
$6.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $6.7M (vs $9.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$119K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$9.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.7M$3.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.6M$103K$3.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$573K$1.7M$2.3M$7.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$119K$119K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT24.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$933K$1.9M$2.8M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$924K$1.8M$2.8M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$757K$1.5M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$60K$119K$119K$119K$119K$119K$119K
Cumulative$0$2.7M$5.3M$8.0M$9.8M$9.8M$9.8M$9.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $9.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x88% / 23.2x92% / 26.2x96% / 29.1x98% / 30.6x100% / 32.0x
9.0x83% / 20.3x87% / 22.9x91% / 25.5x93% / 26.8x95% / 28.1x
10.0x78% / 17.9x83% / 20.3x87% / 22.6x89% / 23.8x90% / 25.0x
11.0x74% / 16.0x79% / 18.1x83% / 20.3x84% / 21.4x86% / 22.4x
12.0x70% / 14.4x75% / 16.4x79% / 18.3x81% / 19.3x83% / 20.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.1x
Headroom (turns)
62%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 62% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.4x, adding 6.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.0M$4.0M2.1%
Year 1$4.1M+$6.5M$10.7M5.7%
Year 2$4.2M+$9.8M$14.1M7.5%
Year 3$4.4M+$9.8M$14.2M7.6%
Year 4$4.5M+$9.8M$14.3M7.7%
Year 5$4.6M+$9.8M$14.4M7.7%
$39.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$158.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$119.0M
Value Created
$14.4M
Exit EBITDA
$6.4M
Organic Growth
$98.2M
RCM Value Creation
$14.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.9M$2.8M$3.7M$4.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.8M$2.8M$3.7M$4.4M
A/R Days Reduction$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.7M
Clean Claim Rate$60K$90K$119K$143K
Total$4.9M$7.4M$9.8M$11.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 53 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.1%-18.0%-3.2%2.4%
P70
Net-to-Gross21.0%14.3%20.7%24.1%
P55
Occupancy55.6%50.5%58.1%73.5%
P40
Rev/Bed$1.1M$760K$1.3M$1.6M
P34
Exp/Bed$1.0M$947K$1.3M$1.6M
P28

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML