Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CENTRASTATE MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CENTRASTATE MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 310111 | NJ | 240 beds | Current EBITDA $-71.3M → Pro Forma $-55.1M (+$16.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$307.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-71.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$16.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-55.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$16.2M
Modeled Uplift
$11.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.6M (vs $16.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$197K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$16.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.2M$6.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.9M$169K$6.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$944K$2.8M$3.7M$11.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$197K$197K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.5M$3.1M$4.6M$6.2M$6.2M$6.2M$6.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.6M$6.1M$6.1M$6.1M$6.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.5M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$98K$197K$197K$197K$197K$197K$197K
Cumulative$0$4.4M$8.8M$13.1M$16.2M$16.2M$16.2M$16.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $16.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-71.3M$-71.3M-23.2%
Year 1$-73.5M+$10.8M$-62.7M-20.4%
Year 2$-75.7M+$16.2M$-59.5M-19.3%
Year 3$-77.9M+$16.2M$-61.8M-20.1%
Year 4$-80.3M+$16.2M$-64.1M-20.8%
Year 5$-82.7M+$16.2M$-66.5M-21.6%
$-713.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-731.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$-18.2M
Value Created
$-66.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-113.6M
Organic Growth
$161.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-66.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.1M$4.6M$6.2M$7.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.0M$4.6M$6.1M$7.3M
A/R Days Reduction$1.9M$2.8M$3.7M$4.5M
Clean Claim Rate$98K$148K$197K$236K
Total$8.1M$12.1M$16.2M$19.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 53 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-23.2%-15.5%-5.7%2.1%
P19
Net-to-Gross25.1%16.3%21.1%25.1%
P74
Occupancy75.8%53.9%60.1%75.8%
P74
Rev/Bed$1.3M$856K$1.3M$1.6M
P47
Exp/Bed$1.6M$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M
P72

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML