Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — JERSEY CITY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — JERSEY CITY MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 310074 | NJ | 289 beds | Current EBITDA $-62.7M → Pro Forma $-38.7M (+$24.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$456.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-62.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$24.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-38.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$17.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$24.0M
Modeled Uplift
$16.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $16.5M (vs $24.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$292K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$24.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.1M$9.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.8M$251K$9.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.4M$4.2M$5.6M$17.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$292K$292K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.3M$4.6M$6.9M$9.1M$9.1M$9.1M$9.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.3M$4.5M$6.8M$9.0M$9.0M$9.0M$9.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.9M$3.7M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$146K$292K$292K$292K$292K$292K$292K
Cumulative$0$6.5M$13.1M$19.5M$24.0M$24.0M$24.0M$24.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $24.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-62.7M$-62.7M-13.7%
Year 1$-64.6M+$16.0M$-48.6M-10.6%
Year 2$-66.5M+$24.0M$-42.5M-9.3%
Year 3$-68.5M+$24.0M$-44.5M-9.7%
Year 4$-70.6M+$24.0M$-46.6M-10.2%
Year 5$-72.7M+$24.0M$-48.7M-10.7%
$-627.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-535.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$91.7M
Value Created
$-48.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-99.9M
Organic Growth
$240.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-48.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.6M$6.9M$9.1M$11.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.5M$6.8M$9.0M$10.9M
A/R Days Reduction$2.8M$4.2M$5.6M$6.7M
Clean Claim Rate$146K$219K$292K$351K
Total$12.0M$18.0M$24.0M$28.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 50 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-13.7%-14.5%-5.0%2.3%
P26
Net-to-Gross21.0%18.0%21.3%25.3%
P42
Occupancy62.4%55.6%62.2%75.8%
P50
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.0M$1.3M$1.7M
P66
Exp/Bed$1.8M$1.0M$1.4M$1.8M
P74

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML