Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MOUNTAINSIDE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MOUNTAINSIDE HOSPITAL
CCN 310054 | NJ | 184 beds | Current EBITDA $37.5M → Pro Forma $53.6M (+$16.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$306.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$37.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$16.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$53.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$16.1M
Modeled Uplift
$11.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.1M (vs $16.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$196K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$16.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.1M$6.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.9M$168K$6.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$940K$2.8M$3.7M$11.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$196K$196K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT24.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.5M$3.1M$4.6M$6.1M$6.1M$6.1M$6.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$6.1M$6.1M$6.1M$6.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.5M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$98K$196K$196K$196K$196K$196K$196K
Cumulative$0$4.4M$8.8M$13.1M$16.1M$16.1M$16.1M$16.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $16.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.7x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.2x
9.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x
10.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.2x
11.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x
12.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.6x
Headroom (turns)
9%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 9% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.9x, adding 2.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$37.5M$37.5M12.2%
Year 1$38.6M+$10.7M$49.4M16.1%
Year 2$39.8M+$16.1M$55.9M18.2%
Year 3$41.0M+$16.1M$57.1M18.6%
Year 4$42.2M+$16.1M$58.3M19.0%
Year 5$43.5M+$16.1M$59.6M19.5%
$375.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$655.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$280.5M
Value Created
$59.6M
Exit EBITDA
$59.7M
Organic Growth
$161.2M
RCM Value Creation
$59.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.1M$4.6M$6.1M$7.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.0M$4.5M$6.1M$7.3M
A/R Days Reduction$1.9M$2.8M$3.7M$4.5M
Clean Claim Rate$98K$147K$196K$235K
Total$8.1M$12.1M$16.1M$19.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 56 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.2%-19.0%-3.5%2.4%
P91
Net-to-Gross23.4%14.5%20.8%24.3%
P71
Occupancy58.1%51.2%58.7%75.6%
P46
Rev/Bed$1.7M$762K$1.3M$1.6M
P77
Exp/Bed$1.5M$991K$1.4M$1.6M
P59

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML