Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. CLARES HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. CLARES HOSPITAL
CCN 310050 | NJ | 217 beds | Current EBITDA $-614K → Pro Forma $14.7M (+$15.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$291.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-614K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$14.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$15.3M
Modeled Uplift
$10.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.5M (vs $15.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$187K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.8M$5.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.6M$160K$5.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$894K$2.7M$3.5M$11.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$187K$187K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.5M$2.9M$4.4M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$93K$187K$187K$187K$187K$187K$187K
Cumulative$0$4.2M$8.4M$12.4M$15.3M$15.3M$15.3M$15.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-0.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.9x
Headroom (turns)
105%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 105% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -0.4x, adding 99.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-614K$-614K-0.2%
Year 1$-632K+$10.2M$9.6M3.3%
Year 2$-651K+$15.3M$14.7M5.0%
Year 3$-671K+$15.3M$14.7M5.0%
Year 4$-691K+$15.3M$14.6M5.0%
Year 5$-712K+$15.3M$14.6M5.0%
$-6.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$160.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$167.0M
Value Created
$14.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-978K
Organic Growth
$153.3M
RCM Value Creation
$14.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.9M$4.4M$5.8M$7.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.9M$4.3M$5.8M$6.9M
A/R Days Reduction$1.8M$2.7M$3.5M$4.3M
Clean Claim Rate$93K$140K$187K$224K
Total$7.7M$11.5M$15.3M$18.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 53 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-0.2%-18.0%-6.7%1.9%
P62
Net-to-Gross20.1%14.8%21.0%25.0%
P43
Occupancy60.1%52.6%59.5%75.6%
P51
Rev/Bed$1.3M$856K$1.3M$1.6M
P53
Exp/Bed$1.3M$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M
P45

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML