Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SHORE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:58 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SHORE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 310047 | NJ | 199 beds | Current EBITDA $49.7M → Pro Forma $62.8M (+$13.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$249.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$49.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$13.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$62.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$9.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$13.1M
Modeled Uplift
$8.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.4M
Execution Discount
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Risk-adjusted uplift: $8.8M (vs $13.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$160K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$13.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.0M$5.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.8M$137K$4.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$767K$2.3M$3.0M$9.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$160K$160K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT24.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.2M$2.5M$3.7M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.2M$2.5M$3.7M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.0M$2.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$80K$160K$160K$160K$160K$160K$160K
Cumulative$0$3.6M$7.2M$10.7M$13.1M$13.1M$13.1M$13.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $13.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x60% / 10.6x
9.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x
10.0x38% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x
11.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
12.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.2x
Headroom (turns)
-3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.7x, adding 1.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$49.7M$49.7M19.9%
Year 1$51.2M+$8.8M$59.9M24.0%
Year 2$52.7M+$13.1M$65.9M26.4%
Year 3$54.3M+$13.1M$67.4M27.0%
Year 4$55.9M+$13.1M$69.1M27.6%
Year 5$57.6M+$13.1M$70.8M28.3%
$496.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$778.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$281.3M
Value Created
$70.8M
Exit EBITDA
$79.1M
Organic Growth
$131.4M
RCM Value Creation
$70.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.5M$3.7M$5.0M$6.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.5M$3.7M$4.9M$5.9M
A/R Days Reduction$1.5M$2.3M$3.0M$3.6M
Clean Claim Rate$80K$120K$160K$192K
Total$6.6M$9.9M$13.1M$15.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 54 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin19.9%-21.0%-4.8%2.1%
P98
Net-to-Gross20.2%14.6%21.0%24.8%
P44
Occupancy49.6%50.7%59.2%75.8%
P17
Rev/Bed$1.3M$786K$1.3M$1.6M
P43
Exp/Bed$1.0M$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M
P24

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML