Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENGLEWOOD HOSPITAL & MED CTR 2026-04-26 03:58 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENGLEWOOD HOSPITAL & MED CTR
CCN 310045 | NJ | 292 beds | Current EBITDA $683K → Pro Forma $51.6M (+$50.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$967.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$683K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$50.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$51.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$37.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$50.9M
Modeled Uplift
$36.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$14.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $36.8M (vs $50.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$19.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$19.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$11.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$619K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$50.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$19.3M$19.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$18.6M$532K$19.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$3.0M$8.8M$11.8M$37.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$619K$619K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$4.8M$9.7M$14.5M$19.3M$19.3M$19.3M$19.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$4.8M$9.6M$14.4M$19.2M$19.2M$19.2M$19.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.9M$7.8M$11.8M$11.8M$11.8M$11.8M$11.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$310K$619K$619K$619K$619K$619K$619K
Cumulative$0$13.9M$27.7M$41.3M$50.9M$50.9M$50.9M$50.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $50.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x253% / 550.2x261% / 611.7x268% / 673.1x271% / 703.9x274% / 734.6x
9.0x245% / 488.7x252% / 543.3x259% / 598.0x262% / 625.3x266% / 652.7x
10.0x238% / 439.5x245% / 488.7x252% / 537.9x255% / 562.5x258% / 587.1x
11.0x231% / 399.2x238% / 444.0x245% / 488.7x248% / 511.0x251% / 533.4x
12.0x226% / 365.7x233% / 406.7x239% / 447.7x242% / 468.2x245% / 488.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.4x
Headroom (turns)
98%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 98% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.1x, adding 8.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$683K$683K0.1%
Year 1$703K+$33.9M$34.6M3.6%
Year 2$724K+$50.9M$51.6M5.3%
Year 3$746K+$50.9M$51.6M5.3%
Year 4$769K+$50.9M$51.7M5.3%
Year 5$792K+$50.9M$51.7M5.3%
$6.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$568.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$561.6M
Value Created
$51.7M
Exit EBITDA
$1.1M
Organic Growth
$508.9M
RCM Value Creation
$51.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$9.7M$14.5M$19.3M$23.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$9.6M$14.4M$19.2M$23.0M
A/R Days Reduction$5.9M$8.8M$11.8M$14.1M
Clean Claim Rate$310K$464K$619K$743K
Total$25.4M$38.2M$50.9M$61.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 51 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.1%-14.3%-4.3%2.2%
P63
Net-to-Gross16.1%18.0%21.4%25.3%
P16
Occupancy67.5%55.7%62.4%75.9%
P57
Rev/Bed$3.3M$1.0M$1.4M$1.8M
P96
Exp/Bed$3.3M$1.0M$1.5M$1.8M
P96

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML