Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — RIVERVIEW MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — RIVERVIEW MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 310034 | NJ | 267 beds | Current EBITDA $20.3M → Pro Forma $39.5M (+$19.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$365.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$20.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$19.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$39.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$14.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$19.2M
Modeled Uplift
$12.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.4M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $12.9M (vs $19.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$234K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$19.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.3M$7.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.0M$201K$7.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.3M$4.4M$14.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$234K$234K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.8M$3.7M$5.5M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.4M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$117K$234K$234K$234K$234K$234K$234K
Cumulative$0$5.2M$10.5M$15.6M$19.2M$19.2M$19.2M$19.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $19.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.9x73% / 15.6x75% / 16.4x77% / 17.3x
9.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 12.0x68% / 13.5x70% / 14.2x72% / 15.0x
10.0x55% / 9.1x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x68% / 13.2x
11.0x51% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.7x
12.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.2x
Headroom (turns)
33%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 33% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.3x, adding 4.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$20.3M$20.3M5.6%
Year 1$20.9M+$12.8M$33.7M9.2%
Year 2$21.5M+$19.2M$40.8M11.2%
Year 3$22.2M+$19.2M$41.4M11.3%
Year 4$22.8M+$19.2M$42.1M11.5%
Year 5$23.5M+$19.2M$42.7M11.7%
$202.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$470.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$267.3M
Value Created
$42.7M
Exit EBITDA
$32.3M
Organic Growth
$192.3M
RCM Value Creation
$42.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.7M$5.5M$7.3M$8.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.6M$5.4M$7.2M$8.7M
A/R Days Reduction$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$5.3M
Clean Claim Rate$117K$175K$234K$281K
Total$9.6M$14.4M$19.2M$23.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 51 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.6%-16.8%-6.7%2.2%
P84
Net-to-Gross25.0%16.6%21.1%25.0%
P73
Occupancy53.9%54.7%60.1%75.6%
P24
Rev/Bed$1.4M$865K$1.3M$1.6M
P55
Exp/Bed$1.3M$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M
P43

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML