Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — VIRTUA OUR LADY OF LOURDES HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — VIRTUA OUR LADY OF LOURDES HOSPITAL
CCN 310029 | NJ | 290 beds | Current EBITDA $10.6M → Pro Forma $34.0M (+$23.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$445.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$10.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$23.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$34.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$17.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$23.4M
Modeled Uplift
$16.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $16.0M (vs $23.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$285K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$23.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.9M$8.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.6M$245K$8.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.4M$4.1M$5.4M$17.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$285K$285K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.2M$4.5M$6.7M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.2M$4.4M$6.6M$8.8M$8.8M$8.8M$8.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$142K$285K$285K$285K$285K$285K$285K
Cumulative$0$6.4M$12.8M$19.0M$23.4M$23.4M$23.4M$23.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $23.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x85% / 21.4x89% / 24.2x93% / 26.9x95% / 28.3x97% / 29.7x
9.0x80% / 18.7x84% / 21.1x88% / 23.6x90% / 24.8x92% / 26.0x
10.0x75% / 16.5x80% / 18.7x84% / 20.9x86% / 22.0x87% / 23.1x
11.0x71% / 14.7x76% / 16.7x80% / 18.7x82% / 19.7x83% / 20.7x
12.0x68% / 13.2x72% / 15.0x76% / 16.9x78% / 17.8x80% / 18.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.9x
Headroom (turns)
60%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 60% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.6x, adding 5.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$10.6M$10.6M2.4%
Year 1$10.9M+$15.6M$26.5M6.0%
Year 2$11.2M+$23.4M$34.6M7.8%
Year 3$11.5M+$23.4M$35.0M7.9%
Year 4$11.9M+$23.4M$35.3M7.9%
Year 5$12.2M+$23.4M$35.7M8.0%
$105.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$392.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$286.7M
Value Created
$35.7M
Exit EBITDA
$16.8M
Organic Growth
$234.2M
RCM Value Creation
$35.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.5M$6.7M$8.9M$10.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.4M$6.6M$8.8M$10.6M
A/R Days Reduction$2.7M$4.1M$5.4M$6.5M
Clean Claim Rate$142K$214K$285K$342K
Total$11.7M$17.6M$23.4M$28.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 51 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.4%-14.3%-4.3%2.2%
P76
Net-to-Gross14.2%18.0%21.4%25.3%
P10
Occupancy59.5%55.7%62.4%75.9%
P39
Rev/Bed$1.5M$1.0M$1.4M$1.8M
P59
Exp/Bed$1.5M$1.0M$1.5M$1.8M
P57

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML