Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHILTON HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHILTON HOSPITAL
CCN 310017 | NJ | 198 beds | Current EBITDA $12.4M → Pro Forma $25.8M (+$13.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$253.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$12.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$13.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$25.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$9.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$13.3M
Modeled Uplift
$9.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.3M
Execution Discount
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $9.0M (vs $13.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$162K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$13.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.1M$5.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.9M$139K$5.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$778K$2.3M$3.1M$9.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$162K$162K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT24.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.3M$2.5M$3.8M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.3M$2.5M$3.8M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.0M$2.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$81K$162K$162K$162K$162K$162K$162K
Cumulative$0$3.6M$7.3M$10.8M$13.3M$13.3M$13.3M$13.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $13.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x67% / 13.1x72% / 14.9x76% / 16.7x77% / 17.6x79% / 18.5x
9.0x62% / 11.3x67% / 12.9x71% / 14.5x73% / 15.3x74% / 16.1x
10.0x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.3x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.2x
11.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x
12.0x50% / 7.6x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.4x
Headroom (turns)
37%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 37% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.1x, adding 4.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$12.4M$12.4M4.9%
Year 1$12.8M+$8.9M$21.7M8.6%
Year 2$13.2M+$13.3M$26.5M10.5%
Year 3$13.6M+$13.3M$26.9M10.6%
Year 4$14.0M+$13.3M$27.3M10.8%
Year 5$14.4M+$13.3M$27.8M10.9%
$124.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$305.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$181.0M
Value Created
$27.8M
Exit EBITDA
$19.8M
Organic Growth
$133.4M
RCM Value Creation
$27.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.5M$3.8M$5.1M$6.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.5M$3.8M$5.0M$6.0M
A/R Days Reduction$1.5M$2.3M$3.1M$3.7M
Clean Claim Rate$81K$122K$162K$195K
Total$6.7M$10.0M$13.3M$16.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 54 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.9%-21.0%-4.8%2.1%
P85
Net-to-Gross16.8%14.6%21.0%24.8%
P31
Occupancy52.6%50.7%59.2%75.8%
P28
Rev/Bed$1.3M$786K$1.3M$1.6M
P46
Exp/Bed$1.2M$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M
P41

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML