Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HOLY NAME HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:13 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HOLY NAME HOSPITAL
CCN 310008 | NJ | 289 beds | Current EBITDA $39.9M → Pro Forma $65.9M (+$26.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$493.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$39.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$26.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$65.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$18.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$26.0M
Modeled Uplift
$17.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.7M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $17.2M (vs $26.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$316K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$26.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.9M$9.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$9.5M$271K$9.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.5M$4.5M$6.0M$18.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$316K$316K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.5M$4.9M$7.4M$9.9M$9.9M$9.9M$9.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.4M$4.9M$7.3M$9.8M$9.8M$9.8M$9.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.0M$4.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$158K$316K$316K$316K$316K$316K$316K
Cumulative$0$7.1M$14.1M$21.0M$26.0M$26.0M$26.0M$26.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $26.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x58% / 10.0x63% / 11.4x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.7x70% / 14.4x
9.0x53% / 8.5x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.4x
10.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.5x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
11.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x
12.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.4x
Headroom (turns)
21%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 21% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.1x, adding 3.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$39.9M$39.9M8.1%
Year 1$41.1M+$17.3M$58.4M11.8%
Year 2$42.3M+$26.0M$68.3M13.8%
Year 3$43.6M+$26.0M$69.6M14.1%
Year 4$44.9M+$26.0M$70.9M14.4%
Year 5$46.3M+$26.0M$72.2M14.6%
$399.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$794.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$395.4M
Value Created
$72.2M
Exit EBITDA
$63.6M
Organic Growth
$259.6M
RCM Value Creation
$72.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.9M$7.4M$9.9M$11.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.9M$7.3M$9.8M$11.7M
A/R Days Reduction$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$7.2M
Clean Claim Rate$158K$237K$316K$379K
Total$13.0M$19.5M$26.0M$31.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 50 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.1%-14.5%-5.0%2.3%
P86
Net-to-Gross27.8%18.0%21.3%25.3%
P78
Occupancy51.5%55.6%62.2%75.8%
P14
Rev/Bed$1.7M$1.0M$1.3M$1.7M
P74
Exp/Bed$1.6M$1.0M$1.4M$1.8M
P66

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML