Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NEWARK BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NEWARK BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 310002 | NJ | 422 beds | Current EBITDA $-61.1M → Pro Forma $-25.8M (+$35.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$669.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-61.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$35.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-25.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$25.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$35.2M
Modeled Uplift
$24.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$10.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $24.5M (vs $35.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$13.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$13.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$429K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$35.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$13.4M$13.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$12.9M$368K$13.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.1M$6.1M$8.2M$25.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$429K$429K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT26.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.3M$6.7M$10.0M$13.4M$13.4M$13.4M$13.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.3M$6.6M$9.9M$13.3M$13.3M$13.3M$13.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$214K$429K$429K$429K$429K$429K$429K
Cumulative$0$9.6M$19.2M$28.6M$35.2M$35.2M$35.2M$35.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $35.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-61.1M$-61.1M-9.1%
Year 1$-62.9M+$23.5M$-39.4M-5.9%
Year 2$-64.8M+$35.2M$-29.6M-4.4%
Year 3$-66.7M+$35.2M$-31.5M-4.7%
Year 4$-68.7M+$35.2M$-33.5M-5.0%
Year 5$-70.8M+$35.2M$-35.6M-5.3%
$-610.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-391.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$219.6M
Value Created
$-35.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-97.3M
Organic Growth
$352.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-35.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.7M$10.0M$13.4M$16.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.6M$9.9M$13.3M$15.9M
A/R Days Reduction$4.1M$6.1M$8.2M$9.8M
Clean Claim Rate$214K$322K$429K$514K
Total$17.6M$26.4M$35.2M$42.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 37 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-9.1%-10.8%-3.1%2.5%
P27
Net-to-Gross23.6%20.2%22.4%26.2%
P57
Occupancy73.1%60.1%69.4%77.1%
P54
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.2M$1.5M$1.9M
P57
Exp/Bed$1.7M$1.3M$1.5M$2.0M
P59

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML