Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ANDROSCOGGIN VALLEY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 07:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ANDROSCOGGIN VALLEY HOSPITAL
CCN 301310 | NH | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.7M → Pro Forma $2.2M (+$3.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$72.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$3.8M
Modeled Uplift
$2.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.2M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.6M (vs $3.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$884K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$47K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.5M$1.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.4M$40K$1.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$223K$661K$884K$2.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$47K$47K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT63.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$363K$727K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$360K$719K$1.1M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$295K$589K$884K$884K$884K$884K$884K
Clean Claim Rate$0$23K$47K$47K$47K$47K$47K$47K
Cumulative$0$1.0M$2.1M$3.1M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-6.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
12.9x
Headroom (turns)
199%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 199% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -6.4x, adding 105.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.7M$-1.7M-2.3%
Year 1$-1.7M+$2.5M$848K1.2%
Year 2$-1.8M+$3.8M$2.1M2.8%
Year 3$-1.8M+$3.8M$2.0M2.8%
Year 4$-1.9M+$3.8M$2.0M2.7%
Year 5$-1.9M+$3.8M$1.9M2.6%
$-16.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$21.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$37.5M
Value Created
$1.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-2.6M
Organic Growth
$38.2M
RCM Value Creation
$1.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$727K$1.1M$1.5M$1.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$719K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M
A/R Days Reduction$442K$663K$884K$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$23K$35K$47K$56K
Total$1.9M$2.9M$3.8M$4.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 14 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-2.3%-8.3%-1.9%0.4%
P43
Net-to-Gross71.2%47.2%52.3%63.2%
P79
Occupancy47.7%46.3%47.8%57.5%
P36
Rev/Bed$2.9M$1.8M$2.9M$3.5M
P50
Exp/Bed$3.0M$1.8M$3.0M$3.8M
P43

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML