Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MONADNOCK COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:17 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MONADNOCK COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
CCN 301309 | NH | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-8.1M → Pro Forma $-3.6M (+$4.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$85.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-8.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-3.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$4.5M
Modeled Uplift
$3.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.4M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.1M (vs $4.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$55K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.7M$1.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.7M$47K$1.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$263K$781K$1.0M$3.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$55K$55K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT63.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$429K$858K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$425K$849K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$348K$696K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$27K$55K$55K$55K$55K$55K$55K
Cumulative$0$1.2M$2.5M$3.7M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-8.1M$-8.1M-9.4%
Year 1$-8.3M+$3.0M$-5.3M-6.2%
Year 2$-8.6M+$4.5M$-4.1M-4.8%
Year 3$-8.9M+$4.5M$-4.3M-5.1%
Year 4$-9.1M+$4.5M$-4.6M-5.4%
Year 5$-9.4M+$4.5M$-4.9M-5.7%
$-81.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-53.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$27.4M
Value Created
$-4.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-12.9M
Organic Growth
$45.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-4.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$858K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$849K$1.3M$1.7M$2.0M
A/R Days Reduction$522K$783K$1.0M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$27K$41K$55K$66K
Total$2.3M$3.4M$4.5M$5.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 14 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-9.4%-8.3%-1.9%0.4%
P14
Net-to-Gross52.2%47.2%52.3%63.2%
P43
Occupancy47.8%46.3%47.8%57.5%
P43
Rev/Bed$3.4M$1.8M$2.9M$3.5M
P57
Exp/Bed$3.8M$1.8M$3.0M$3.8M
P71

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML