Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — VALLEY REGIONAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 11:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — VALLEY REGIONAL HOSPITAL
CCN 301308 | NH | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $137K → Pro Forma $3.0M (+$2.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$54.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$137K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$2.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$924K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.9M (vs $2.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$661K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$35K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.1M$1.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.0M$30K$1.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$167K$494K$661K$2.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$35K$35K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT63.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$272K$543K$815K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$269K$538K$806K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$220K$441K$661K$661K$661K$661K$661K
Clean Claim Rate$0$17K$35K$35K$35K$35K$35K$35K
Cumulative$0$778K$1.6M$2.3M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x175% / 158.3x181% / 176.2x187% / 194.2x189% / 203.1x192% / 212.1x
9.0x169% / 140.3x175% / 156.3x180% / 172.2x183% / 180.2x185% / 188.2x
10.0x163% / 126.0x169% / 140.3x174% / 154.7x177% / 161.8x179% / 169.0x
11.0x158% / 114.2x164% / 127.3x169% / 140.3x171% / 146.8x174% / 153.4x
12.0x153% / 104.4x159% / 116.4x164% / 128.3x166% / 134.3x169% / 140.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.1x
Headroom (turns)
94%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 94% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.4x, adding 8.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$137K$137K0.3%
Year 1$141K+$1.9M$2.0M3.8%
Year 2$145K+$2.9M$3.0M5.5%
Year 3$149K+$2.9M$3.0M5.5%
Year 4$154K+$2.9M$3.0M5.5%
Year 5$158K+$2.9M$3.0M5.6%
$1.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$33.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$31.8M
Value Created
$3.0M
Exit EBITDA
$217K
Organic Growth
$28.6M
RCM Value Creation
$3.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$543K$815K$1.1M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$538K$806K$1.1M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$330K$496K$661K$793K
Clean Claim Rate$17K$26K$35K$42K
Total$1.4M$2.1M$2.9M$3.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 14 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.3%-8.3%-1.9%0.4%
P64
Net-to-Gross63.7%47.2%52.3%63.2%
P71
Occupancy45.8%46.3%47.8%57.5%
P21
Rev/Bed$2.2M$1.8M$2.9M$3.5M
P29
Exp/Bed$2.2M$1.8M$3.0M$3.8M
P29

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML