Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 07:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 301307 | NH | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $1.3M → Pro Forma $6.4M (+$5.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$97.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$5.1M
Modeled Uplift
$3.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.3M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.8M (vs $5.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$63K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.0M$2.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.9M$54K$1.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$300K$889K$1.2M$3.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$63K$63K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT63.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$489K$977K$1.5M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$484K$967K$1.5M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$396K$793K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$31K$63K$63K$63K$63K$63K$63K
Cumulative$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.2M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x104% / 35.3x109% / 39.6x113% / 43.9x115% / 46.0x117% / 48.1x
9.0x99% / 31.0x103% / 34.8x108% / 38.6x110% / 40.5x112% / 42.4x
10.0x94% / 27.6x99% / 31.0x103% / 34.4x105% / 36.1x107% / 37.9x
11.0x90% / 24.8x95% / 27.9x99% / 31.0x101% / 32.6x103% / 34.1x
12.0x86% / 22.4x91% / 25.3x95% / 28.2x97% / 29.6x99% / 31.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.8x
Headroom (turns)
75%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 75% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.7x, adding 6.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.3M$1.3M1.3%
Year 1$1.3M+$3.4M$4.7M4.8%
Year 2$1.3M+$5.1M$6.5M6.6%
Year 3$1.4M+$5.1M$6.5M6.7%
Year 4$1.4M+$5.1M$6.5M6.7%
Year 5$1.4M+$5.1M$6.6M6.7%
$12.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$72.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$60.0M
Value Created
$6.6M
Exit EBITDA
$2.0M
Organic Growth
$51.4M
RCM Value Creation
$6.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$977K$1.5M$2.0M$2.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$967K$1.5M$1.9M$2.3M
A/R Days Reduction$595K$892K$1.2M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$31K$47K$63K$75K
Total$2.6M$3.9M$5.1M$6.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 14 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.3%-8.3%-1.9%0.4%
P79
Net-to-Gross52.4%47.2%52.3%63.2%
P50
Occupancy65.6%46.3%47.8%57.5%
P86
Rev/Bed$3.9M$1.8M$2.9M$3.5M
P79
Exp/Bed$3.9M$1.8M$3.0M$3.8M
P79

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML