Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DESERT PARKWAY BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE 2026-04-26 05:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DESERT PARKWAY BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE
CCN 294013 | NV | 152 beds | Current EBITDA $26K → Pro Forma $1.7M (+$1.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$30.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$26K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$1.6M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$519K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$618K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$612K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$376K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$20K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$618K$618K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$595K$17K$612K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$95K$281K$376K$1.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$20K$20K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$155K$309K$464K$618K$618K$618K$618K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$153K$306K$459K$612K$612K$612K$612K
A/R Days Reduction$0$125K$251K$376K$376K$376K$376K$376K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$20K$20K$20K$20K$20K$20K
Cumulative$0$443K$886K$1.3M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x240% / 456.4x248% / 507.5x254% / 558.6x258% / 584.1x261% / 609.7x
9.0x232% / 405.4x239% / 450.8x246% / 496.2x249% / 518.9x252% / 541.6x
10.0x225% / 364.5x232% / 405.4x239% / 446.2x242% / 466.7x245% / 487.1x
11.0x219% / 331.1x226% / 368.2x232% / 405.4x235% / 423.9x238% / 442.5x
12.0x214% / 303.2x220% / 337.3x227% / 371.3x229% / 388.4x232% / 405.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.4x
Headroom (turns)
98%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 98% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.1x, adding 8.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$26K$26K0.1%
Year 1$27K+$1.1M$1.1M3.6%
Year 2$28K+$1.6M$1.7M5.4%
Year 3$29K+$1.6M$1.7M5.4%
Year 4$30K+$1.6M$1.7M5.4%
Year 5$31K+$1.6M$1.7M5.4%
$264K
Entry EV (10x)
$18.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$18.0M
Value Created
$1.7M
Exit EBITDA
$42K
Organic Growth
$16.3M
RCM Value Creation
$1.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$309K$464K$618K$742K
Denial Rate Reductio$306K$459K$612K$735K
A/R Days Reduction$188K$282K$376K$452K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$15K$20K$24K
Total$813K$1.2M$1.6M$2.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 22 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.1%-16.7%0.4%7.3%
P45
Net-to-Gross39.3%10.6%26.0%39.6%
P68
Occupancy67.2%56.3%65.3%75.1%
P55
Rev/Bed$203K$206K$442K$1.2M
P23
Exp/Bed$203K$244K$571K$1.2M
P18

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML