Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SPRING MOUNTAIN TREATMENT CENTER 2026-04-26 05:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SPRING MOUNTAIN TREATMENT CENTER
CCN 294011 | NV | 110 beds | Current EBITDA $126K → Pro Forma $1.0M (+$885K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$16.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$126K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$885K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$646K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$885K
Modeled Uplift
$591K
Risk-Adjusted
-$295K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$337K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$333K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$205K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$885K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$337K$337K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$324K$9K$333K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$52K$153K$205K$646K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$84K$168K$252K$337K$337K$337K$337K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$83K$167K$250K$333K$333K$333K$333K
A/R Days Reduction$0$68K$137K$205K$205K$205K$205K$205K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$241K$482K$718K$885K$885K$885K$885K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $885K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x124% / 56.5x129% / 63.1x134% / 69.8x136% / 73.1x138% / 76.4x
9.0x119% / 49.9x123% / 55.8x128% / 61.7x130% / 64.6x132% / 67.6x
10.0x114% / 44.5x119% / 49.9x123% / 55.2x125% / 57.8x127% / 60.5x
11.0x109% / 40.2x114% / 45.0x119% / 49.9x121% / 52.3x123% / 54.7x
12.0x105% / 36.6x110% / 41.0x115% / 45.4x117% / 47.6x119% / 49.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.4x
Headroom (turns)
84%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 84% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.1x, adding 7.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$126K$126K0.8%
Year 1$130K+$590K$720K4.3%
Year 2$134K+$885K$1.0M6.1%
Year 3$138K+$885K$1.0M6.1%
Year 4$142K+$885K$1.0M6.1%
Year 5$146K+$885K$1.0M6.1%
$1.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$11.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$10.1M
Value Created
$1.0M
Exit EBITDA
$201K
Organic Growth
$8.9M
RCM Value Creation
$1.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$168K$252K$337K$404K
Denial Rate Reductio$167K$250K$333K$400K
A/R Days Reduction$102K$154K$205K$246K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$11K$13K
Total$443K$664K$885K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 22 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.8%-16.7%0.4%9.9%
P50
Net-to-Gross35.7%15.9%33.3%39.6%
P59
Occupancy58.8%54.8%62.8%73.2%
P32
Rev/Bed$153K$206K$442K$1.1M
P18
Exp/Bed$152K$239K$489K$1.2M
P5

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML