Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 293033 | NV | 50 beds | Current EBITDA $1.2M → Pro Forma $2.5M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$23.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$918K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$922K
Risk-Adjusted
-$338K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$479K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$474K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$291K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$15K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$479K$479K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$461K$13K$474K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$73K$218K$291K$918K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$15K$15K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$120K$239K$359K$479K$479K$479K$479K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$119K$237K$356K$474K$474K$474K$474K
A/R Days Reduction$0$97K$194K$291K$291K$291K$291K$291K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K
Cumulative$0$343K$686K$1.0M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x66% / 12.8x71% / 14.6x75% / 16.3x77% / 17.2x78% / 18.1x
9.0x62% / 11.0x66% / 12.6x70% / 14.2x72% / 14.9x74% / 15.7x
10.0x57% / 9.6x62% / 11.0x66% / 12.4x67% / 13.1x69% / 13.8x
11.0x53% / 8.4x58% / 9.7x62% / 11.0x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.3x
12.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.3x
Headroom (turns)
36%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 36% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.2x, adding 4.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.2M$1.2M5.1%
Year 1$1.3M+$840K$2.1M8.8%
Year 2$1.3M+$1.3M$2.6M10.7%
Year 3$1.3M+$1.3M$2.6M10.8%
Year 4$1.4M+$1.3M$2.6M11.0%
Year 5$1.4M+$1.3M$2.7M11.2%
$12.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$29.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$17.2M
Value Created
$2.7M
Exit EBITDA
$1.9M
Organic Growth
$12.6M
RCM Value Creation
$2.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$239K$359K$479K$575K
Denial Rate Reductio$237K$356K$474K$569K
A/R Days Reduction$146K$219K$291K$350K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$11K$15K$18K
Total$630K$945K$1.3M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 21 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.1%-13.8%4.0%12.1%
P52
Net-to-Gross59.0%25.9%40.8%53.6%
P86
Occupancy79.1%32.3%54.5%62.1%
P86
Rev/Bed$479K$428K$812K$1.4M
P33
Exp/Bed$454K$412K$606K$1.5M
P33

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML