Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BANNER CHURCHILL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BANNER CHURCHILL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
CCN 291313 | NV | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $4.7M → Pro Forma $8.3M (+$3.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$69.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$8.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$3.6M
Modeled Uplift
$2.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.6M (vs $3.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$842K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$44K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.4M$1.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.3M$38K$1.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$212K$630K$842K$2.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$44K$44K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT55.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$346K$692K$1.0M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$342K$685K$1.0M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$281K$561K$842K$842K$842K$842K$842K
Clean Claim Rate$0$22K$44K$44K$44K$44K$44K$44K
Cumulative$0$991K$2.0M$3.0M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x61% / 10.9x66% / 12.5x70% / 14.0x71% / 14.8x73% / 15.6x
9.0x56% / 9.3x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.1x67% / 12.8x68% / 13.5x
10.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x
11.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x
12.0x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.7x
Headroom (turns)
27%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 27% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.8x, adding 3.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.7M$4.7M6.8%
Year 1$4.8M+$2.4M$7.3M10.5%
Year 2$5.0M+$3.6M$8.6M12.5%
Year 3$5.1M+$3.6M$8.8M12.7%
Year 4$5.3M+$3.6M$8.9M12.9%
Year 5$5.5M+$3.6M$9.1M13.1%
$47.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$100.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$53.0M
Value Created
$9.1M
Exit EBITDA
$7.5M
Organic Growth
$36.4M
RCM Value Creation
$9.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$692K$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$685K$1.0M$1.4M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$421K$631K$842K$1.0M
Clean Claim Rate$22K$33K$44K$53K
Total$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$4.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 17 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.8%-17.9%2.0%6.8%
P71
Net-to-Gross49.4%22.8%46.5%55.9%
P59
Occupancy60.6%23.4%41.8%60.6%
P71
Rev/Bed$2.8M$479K$1.1M$1.4M
P88
Exp/Bed$2.6M$454K$1.3M$1.7M
P82

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML