Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WILLIAM BEE RIRIE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WILLIAM BEE RIRIE HOSPITAL
CCN 291302 | NV | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-6.3M → Pro Forma $-4.4M (+$1.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$35.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-6.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-4.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$1.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$728K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$702K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$695K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$427K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$22K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$702K$702K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$675K$19K$695K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$108K$319K$427K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$22K$22K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT55.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$175K$351K$526K$702K$702K$702K$702K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$174K$347K$521K$695K$695K$695K$695K
A/R Days Reduction$0$142K$285K$427K$427K$427K$427K$427K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K
Cumulative$0$503K$1.0M$1.5M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-6.3M$-6.3M-17.9%
Year 1$-6.5M+$1.2M$-5.2M-14.9%
Year 2$-6.7M+$1.8M$-4.8M-13.7%
Year 3$-6.9M+$1.8M$-5.0M-14.3%
Year 4$-7.1M+$1.8M$-5.2M-14.9%
Year 5$-7.3M+$1.8M$-5.4M-15.5%
$-62.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-59.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$3.0M
Value Created
$-5.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-10.0M
Organic Growth
$18.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-5.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$351K$526K$702K$842K
Denial Rate Reductio$347K$521K$695K$834K
A/R Days Reduction$213K$320K$427K$512K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$17K$22K$27K
Total$923K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 17 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-17.9%-17.9%2.0%6.8%
P24
Net-to-Gross55.9%22.8%46.5%55.9%
P71
Occupancy13.2%23.4%41.8%60.6%
P12
Rev/Bed$1.4M$479K$1.1M$1.4M
P71
Exp/Bed$1.7M$454K$1.3M$1.7M
P71

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML