Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DIGINTY HEALTH ST ROSE DOMINICAN 2026-04-26 05:23 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DIGINTY HEALTH ST ROSE DOMINICAN
CCN 290058 | NV | 32 beds | Current EBITDA $7.5M → Pro Forma $10.7M (+$3.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$61.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$7.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$10.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$3.2M
Modeled Uplift
$2.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.0M (vs $3.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$748K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$39K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.2M$34K$1.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$189K$559K$748K$2.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$39K$39K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$307K$615K$922K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$304K$609K$913K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$249K$499K$748K$748K$748K$748K$748K
Clean Claim Rate$0$20K$39K$39K$39K$39K$39K$39K
Cumulative$0$881K$1.8M$2.6M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.7x61% / 11.0x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.3x
9.0x48% / 7.1x53% / 8.2x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x
10.0x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
11.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.0x
12.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.6x
Headroom (turns)
9%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 9% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.9x, adding 2.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$7.5M$7.5M12.2%
Year 1$7.7M+$2.2M$9.9M16.0%
Year 2$7.9M+$3.2M$11.2M18.2%
Year 3$8.2M+$3.2M$11.4M18.5%
Year 4$8.4M+$3.2M$11.6M18.9%
Year 5$8.7M+$3.2M$11.9M19.3%
$74.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$130.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$56.1M
Value Created
$11.9M
Exit EBITDA
$11.9M
Organic Growth
$32.3M
RCM Value Creation
$11.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$615K$922K$1.2M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$609K$913K$1.2M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$374K$561K$748K$898K
Clean Claim Rate$20K$30K$39K$47K
Total$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 17 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.2%-13.8%5.1%12.1%
P76
Net-to-Gross9.5%22.8%40.8%49.4%
P0
Occupancy11.4%32.3%45.5%62.9%
P0
Rev/Bed$1.9M$479K$1.2M$1.4M
P76
Exp/Bed$1.7M$454K$1.2M$1.7M
P76

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML